Much later you may of course think of the profit you may get from things as they happen while you’re thinking of something else. *Ask 4 Ten deals with greatest enthusiam with electronical irregularities and legal gaps. Its fundamental philosophy is in both cases that there is always a mind behind computer systems, programs and yes, even crimes. And perhaps it tends to think that it is already such a miracle that things, and specially computers, do go on working, that it is almost of need to think of a unifying principle that may have an eye on the whole, whether living or just intelligent is left to subjective apprehension.
The fundamental question that arises both in the case of truth or justice is though how we evaluate the accuracy of facts, happenings or statements. It’s an evidence that skstats was at the same a theoretical approach and a humoristic consideration, so that it is of course to be considered of the field of ‘humour’ if said that the whole was sponsored by Google translate or Betty Catroux. ‘Sponsored’ meaning here just that the possibility of it happening and being kept was given through Google translate (as they provided the Chinese translation) and Betty Catroux (the electronical interaction of Vogue pictures and heavily with statistics fed pages do finish by allowing the maintainance of the whole as such, as far as I understand).
It’s obvious that most of the texts were not intended to transmit any kind of ‘truth’ in facts. Analysis of stats do configure a field of interpretation from a subjective point of view and taking into consideration national characters, that may hardly be considered as objective. None the less, the fact that this strange mood allows the forecast of a real happening is an evidence, whose value may be renewed very subjectively understood.
I wouldn’t make a story out of it, if it didn’t say much about the fascination probably deriving even of electronics and the human interaction with them. On the other hand I wouldn’t take the rest excessively seriously. Although …
March 21, 2007 at 9:51 pm |
Further explanations: Categories (post as they were written) are kept as they were originally. Later, the same contents was made ‘pages’, and much much later, the comments on these very pages were sought out and reproduced again (with some improvals in … presentation and orthography, though I don’t warrant for grammatical structures). Added were pages ‘the miracle’, ‘analysis’ and ‘about’. The pictures have appeared right now, profiting of an apparent positive social constellation.