_______________________
Dear Ms Wingsurf, if you want to become a serious referent for publishing houses, you have to sharpen control on the stats department, if you allow advice. Observe how, first: traffic on blog is reported 0 for today while researches show up to 12 viewers on concrete posts. (I often make researches with different tags and they don’t appear on stats: as these do appear it means that people have actually found the page, and open it, why does it not appear?) Probable outer intervention… told you, hot days the last days… Now, what is the strange research on numbers falling immediately on my blog in Google, second place?See that yesterday I copied the tags after 9 o’clock, when today’s tags are passed to yesterday. You may easily state that yesterday’s tags are fuller than they were yesterday. Conclude what you want but I would say that tags have been stop of appearing on the screen and appeared all together after. Idiots have this in common with idiocy that they are idiots, which is to say that the mark of the crime … is left at the place of the crime. I have no further means of determining the causes of the disturbances but you have. Now, for the pingbacks. You will see that the IP numbers do appear by making deeper researches on ‘comments’. IP numbers (I don’t know very much about it but let us guess), have usually first three numbers in common depending on country.
Spain reveals number of origin 86. There are two groups of numbers, those starting with 207 and those starting with 72. I would intuitively say that they belong to one sole ‘agency’ each as numbers are very similar, and would situate 72 in Israel and 207 in Russia probably with US numbers as shield, which means of some SVR or related, as others not having the means. Pingbacks of 72 do stop November 10th, (just when I have posted something saying that Israel is … and that pingback seem covered, consequently 72 seems to be Israel and reacting immediately to imaginary revealing of source) and reappears November 12th, in a pingback that appears between two following posts: Congratulations Sask and the following. What would you think of the whole?
We will go to angel’s wishes (http://sonjakastentoo.wordpress.com) which will have as definite aim the following: how to make an a real coincidental meeting through electronic waves an … empirical encounter. The first we managed, will we manage the second? Thanks to Inès de
la Fressange, probably yes: she simply does not believe that Intelligent Service’s agents are called angels in Russian, so that things become a lot easier: you do not only have to work with what people believe but also with what…people would never believe. The evidence! If I ever meet
Sask and even boast myself through internet … bet, nobody will ever believe it! Now, concerning the strange angelical association with the Intelligence Services in Russian, I think that engel (angel) does originally mean apostle does originally mean apostle (apostalmeno, Greek for: one who is sent, messenger), from there the probable origin of angle-Saxon: sent by the Saxonian. It should be no other tribe, but a referent. Certainly a slav word that is later associated to the the Greek ‘angelos’ (angel). See the possible link to Turkish ‘gel’ (come) with proposition in meaning of ‘in’ (the one who comes in), but this is Malabar! To tell you the truth, Natasha, I have never loved a book more than ‘Michail Strogoff’ version Dumas but probably a popular Russian story. I read it when I was 13, and it was a present of my grandmother for … my sister, I stole without any shame whatsoever. Has to do with angels? Here, thus, the stats, leaving heavy references to Madame Inès de
la Fressange, who saw immediately, but really immediately the open doors to the American market and started even following instructions and pick other people’s inspirations in order to obtain … unlikely to be French results …
