Stats 15th and 16th of november with test November 16, 2006Posted by sonjakasten1 in Statistics 2. trackback , edit post
Blog Stats
People clicked links from these pages to get to your blog.Today
| Referrer | Views |
Yesterday
| Referrer | Views |
| botd.wordpress.com/growing-blogs | 1 |
| fanpop.com/spots/wordpress.com | 1 |
| search.msn.co.uk/results.aspx?q=lates… | 1 |
Top PostsThese posts on your blog got the most traffic.Today
Yesterday
| Title | Views | |
| For Sask | 2 | |
| Please, explain | 1 | |
| Disaster on stats: Greece’s inspirations | 1 | |
| How someone became famous all alone by h | 1 | |
| In tones and undertones | 1 | |
| Famous people | 1 | |
| Athina Onassis | 1 |
Search Engine TermsThese are terms people used to find your blog.Today
| Search | Views |
| “daniel noboa” | 2 |
| pictures of myself | 2 |
| skulans translation | 1 |
| easily influenced | 1 |
| lou andreas salome | 1 |
| abstract+hikmet karabulut | 1 |
| athina onassis greek | 1 |
| where my family came from | 1 |
| “snobbish people” switzerland | 1 |
| my grandma is most | 1 |
Yesterday
| Search | Views |
| P. David Hornik | 2 |
| about myself character | 1 |
| how thw pakistani wedding | 1 |
| how movies changed my aspects of my life | 1 |
| athina onassis relationship with father | 1 |
| anecdotes psychology | 1 |
| famous people in madrid | 1 |
| gianis kotsiras official site | 1 |
Blog Stats — MyselfTotal Views: 408Best Day Ever: 49Views today: 18TotalsPosts: 119Comments: 25Tags: 34SpamAkismet has protected your site from 12 spam comments.Incoming Links· change of section · http://soyouthinkican.wordpress.com · aleatory researches · http://greenqueen.wordpress.com · http://davidwbowles.wordpress.com · sonja kasten continues research of glory · http://cynicpad.wordpress.com
· changes
Comments and different remarks on 15&16 November 16, 2006Posted by sonjakasten1 in Statistics 2. trackback , edit post To say the truth, I was quite happy these last days. My marketing campaign has enormous success and maintains http://sonjakasten1.wordpress.com at high peaks even if I don’t write anything new.To continue with the explanations I give to grandma, who has been really through the stats course, and has now quite a lot of arising questions, to say: the engine terms refer themselves to the top posts today in a quite obvious way. Let us take yesterday:this search ‘athina onassis relationship with father’ leads to this top post ‘Athina Onassis‘this one ‘gianis kotsiras official site’ to ‘In tones and undertones‘, etcToday looks like that:Today
| Title | Views | |
| Disaster on stats: Greece’s inspirations | 2 | |
| For my grandma… | 1 | |
| Athina Onassis | 1 | |
| Devils |
linked toSearch Engine TermsThese are terms people used to find your blog.Today
| Search | Views |
| pictures of myself | 2 (falls on ‘my pictures of myself) |
| easily influenced | 1 (falls on ‘corrections’) |
| abstract+hikmet karabulut | 1 (falls on ‘3 or 4 paintings’) |
| where my family came from | 1 (falls on ‘where my family came from, I guess’.) |
| my grandma is most (falls on ‘for my grandma’) |
Of 12 researches 7 top posts seem to be directly linked to them, while 5 are not. ‘Devils’, ‘Lou Andreas Salome’, ‘Disaster on stats’, do not seem to have been read as a result of research. You can thus conclude two things: either they are the result of tag surfer publication or some people are specifically opening pages after an interest on something before.(There are researches missing as one on Stergiopoulos+PASOK and one said ‘jokes related to present perfect’ or something like that) which means that WP does only take ten researches and also a limited amount of top posts. It doesn’t matter, aleatory factors do help in aleatory research.Here some results:research: easily influencedcorrections « Myself- [ Traduzca esta página ]
| Are you easily influenced by others, against your own judgement? NO: I let myself be influenced in order to get the coordinates of some one I may want to … sonjakasten1.wordpress.com/tag/corrections/ – 48k – 14 Nov 2006 – En caché – Páginas similares |
Research: snobbish people
SwitzerlandCharacters « Myself- [ Traduzca esta página ]
| In fact, it said much more about the need of people of knowing certain … by the way, and the only of the very snobbish people in the surroundings I … sonjakasten1.wordpress.com/tag/characters/ – 40k – En caché – Páginas similares |
Research: funny present perfect sentencesThen under “breakfast, still using present perfect”2006 October 25 « Myself- [ Traduzca esta página ]
| How often though have we already had breakfast while still using the present perfect? Hint: Try making the difference between the action and the time period … sonjakasten1.wordpress.com/2006/10/25/ – 23k – En caché – Páginas similares If you take into consideration all these factors, you may soon come to the following conclusion: it appears strangely as if some ‘highly situated organisms had been attracted by research on stats and copying some methodology (probably a let us see what this is about approach). This affects people who have nothing to do with stats and just think it is funny entertainment. On the other hand What is new, some private people, informed of their appearance in Google do start researches, too (fun to show). This produces a new movement, the recurrent reseraches dopush the block forward and it appears more frequently in not linked researches (accidental).And this finishes up by having the following strange side effect: the blog invades msn research engine:Reference in MSN as given for UK· IOL: Onassis Greek tragedy still fascinates… Greece’s most famous sons, shipping tycoon Aristotle Onassis built … Rare pictures include British Prime Minister Winston Churchill … passed away in Argentina in 1988, survived by her daughter Athinao www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=24&art_id=qw1160210341697B262 o · Cached page · Stats with cache « Myselfpictures of athina onassis: 1 “Lou Andreas-Salome” and Nietzsche: 1: lazy market jerez: 1 … uacct = “UA-52447-2″; _udn = “wordpress.com”; urchinTracker(); /**/ the latest newso sonjakasten1.wordpress.com/2006/11/09/110 o · 14/11/2006 o · Cached page briam school madrid: 1: Onassis Athina: 1: Athina empire: 1: names of the people who went to the moon: 1 “ america don’t worry. israel is behind yo: 1: latest pictures of athina onassis: 1 o sonjakasten1.wordpress.com/2006/11/06/please-explain o · Cached page And completely alters factors in wordpress’ headlines priorities, where the appearance of the ‘Book of cristals” does give the blog three (!!)pages of headlines:
welcomeWelcome to The WordPress.com Spot! This is a place for the WordPress.community to vote for what they think are the best posts.Submit your best posts.
« Previous Page 2 of 6Next »
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WordPress engine categorizing system is fascinated by my book, which seems to be already very popular (?) Why? What has happened? The leave fallen in october has provoked a storm 10 000 km away ..,. (theory of chaos.) Let’s have something to eat and think about it …
Stats and psychology November 17, 2006Posted by sonjakasten1 in Psychology. trackback , edit post The question is exactly there: not only to determine what we are doing but what we are aiming at, and why, and finally, what there may result as benefit for others of all your sufferings. (A general question which others would gain asking themselves, too.)As said, it is vital to know where we are in order to understand what we are doing, and we may be quite certain that the goal is partly already determined by this understanding.Can a personal question affect many other people, and if yes, why?From a very personal point of view, it is nothing but a crash of systems, that starts very early but takes a decisive turn in
Paris 1992. Fundamental definitions of main concepts do hit general behaviour depending on the most generally structuring main concepts of Kant. Politics, administration, army, news and information are mainly suspended of an … abstract mistake (definition of form and matter). The consequences may be disastruous.The alteration of main concepts does provoke a shift in the organization of information as perceived, read, heard, understood. This alteration does though join somehow buried not explicited metaphysics (turkish, greek, russian, chinese, ethiopian): the lines of ‘contact’ (ordering of information or reality through the same parameters) allow strongest currents of information flow to these regions (1994-2001).The ‘war’ between two different principles in metaphysics arrives to peaks 2001/3: while great parts of fields in social organization do pump possible solutions from system B, it gathers strength gained from these solutions in order to attack the source of the solution.The image appearing is that a principle in behaviour has been derived from the new definitions, and that this principle is invading groupements in society, were it companies, were it administration or what ever, without the legislation or political awareness being ordered towards the possible integration of the new coordinates into a given fromal scheme. As I don’t have all the possible derivating formal schemes in social organization, the possible bad side effects of the fusion of systems are countered through intuitive immediate response without there existing a general frame. That is: the RAM memory is working 48 hours a day without corresponding backing in hard disk. (I remember that I was still ordering information while sleeping: one day I was dreaming someone was coming up to my house and I woke up while this person was knocking at the door …)I suppose in 2002 there is a fusion of the level of intentionality or possibility with reality. My intuitiv stats do allow thinking up to 80% of humanity having changed internal parameters of structuring reality (Asia, Russia, Africa,
South America). The opposition provokes most violent interactions with Europe, US and
Israel.
Israel simply disappears, gets drown. US gives in after obvious disasters in
Europe. Great parts of Europe get lost, mostly Germany and
France and surrounding countries. (In 6 years time.)Not really very conscious of what is going on, I try a completely mad hypothesis. I’m the opposition in the contrary system to myself. If I’m able to convince myself of the fact that I’m wrong and SK is right, people follwing the same logic will simply give in without opposition. This may avoid disasters although certainly not the loss of power deriving against Europe and favoring China and
Russia.The question is that I’m encarnating the fusion of systems myself. I’m the very problem deriving of two crashing metaphysics, I have to solve before it is too late. On the other hand, actual support is unexisting: China or
Russia have related metaphysics but not the same, consequently they do not see a certain number of dark holes I have to go through. (A human being, this theory says, is embedded in a similarly acting or thinking compound, where he actually feels well. Marginal thought does not have psychic support and does thus get very easily lost. In the attempt of solving the arising problem, I do create a double of myself who is in deep love with me and whose indefinite understanding of my heroic acts, does generate the psychic support needed in order to continue.)In the hypothesis as more or less sketched 2001/2002, there should be a moment where I have to break this ‘narcissistic circle’ by arbitrarily projecting the other ‘I’ into two extremely powerful natures having more or less the same coordinates: Natasha SPY and
SASK, two satellite systems. Natasha SPY is related to Natasha the same way SASK is related to
Sask: they are the only ones who have a ‘clear notion’ (without concept) of the functioning of the system in an almost ‘friendly’ (to mine) interpretation scheme.The relationship from ‘me’ to a satelite is the same than the one of one system to another: three or four fundamental concepts do potentially derive a … whole world, that does look first like two incompatible satellite systems tending to happily distroy each other until some kind of ‘human’ factor does alter inner coordinates and thus the interaction between both. This model is the one that is crashing with a ‘mononomian’ (one law, other than binomian: double law) system. My ‘I’ is thus situated in the potential realization of the deriving kosmos or world depending on main concepts, which is to say an immense compound dealing with energies and forces coming mainly from ‘friendly’ systems. The future is fighting against the present in the desperate attempt not to make all present disappear as it is: the evidence of ‘it will be like that’ should impose itself on still reluctant minds that would get lost otherwise.The question is that my becoming a sheet of plastic does lower fundamental functions of consciousness (which arrived in
Greece to up to 8 dimensions in different perspective) to a single or the most double perspective. In a certain way I have become the slave of my own program or determination of solving a problem, without having exact control on what is really happening. The submission to alternative parameters derived of the functioning of Natascha SPY and
SASK, do allow to ‘keep at least some kind of appearance.’At a certain moment I have to find
Sask and Natasha in order to validate the reality of what is going on. To integrate a retroactive logic in the present that is altering behaviour and organization without there being a formal structure corresponding (the constant overcharge of intuitive reaction does finally lead to an evident relegation of the male who does not answer on time to the request of formalizing reality in appropriate schemes).Happily I go thus in research of
Sask and Natascha.My departure point is a wrong definition: “you are famous if you appear very often in Google.” Actually famous is: “known by people, or by many poeple” and the very fact of appearing in Google, does not warrant at all that people know how often you appear there. In fact, most of the definitions deriving of a computer logic imposed as being more sophisticated or intelligent than the human logic, are deviated in essence. The human being does not synthesize through spirit and identity the essence of a notion in order to understand a word, but associates arbitrarily an ‘appearing’ (empirical impression) to another empirical accident: in computer logic my definition is … true.The understanding of the computer logic does quickly give results: I become very famous very quickly. This and not anything else is the contact point to Natasha and
Sask. The evident awareness of the hilarious situation (False) deriving of a wrong definition that appears being true in another system (True) is the notion
Sask and Natasha are working at. Sympathy attracts similarity: I find both in three weeks time.I have a contact point to reality, where my ’system’ may survive without being excessively agressed. The stats are the marks of the development of further sympathetic fields. They reflect the intuitive ordering of information as being the result of the confrontation of my own system with reality. Which is to say, they are not really ordered, but reflect the possibility of integration of organic thought into computer logic.Organic thought does act through a determining principle (need) in a progressive process of discovery which augmentates depending on the faculty of integration of new information in a given human system.At the begining I don’t know what a tag surfer is. Progressively it is explored and integrated into the general organization, given limits, or put problems on. The fact that something is there without you knowing how it works, allows to act in a certain innocence until you get aware of what is going on. At that moment you have to integrate possible side effects. Once you have done so, you go one integrating new coordinates, until you ‘master’ the logic in front and either you get bored either you decide to make of it a more general tool of work. The process of discovery becomes a rationally integrated movement that does determine behaviour and time schedules: I need two hours a day in order to go through my WordPress experiment.In fact, the main advantage of organic logic is that it integrates in thought the possible deviation from a more common reality through notion analysis of a given perception of things. Example: I meet Maya in “El Cafecito”,
Cuenca, Ecuador on her round trip around the world. My always extremely seducing manners do finally convince her of telling me that she has been at the IS. (It was enough to know that maya means water in semitic language). She has a notion of the IS that is deformed by her own personal character. Having clear perception of what her character is, it should be possible to attach the notion to a given reality. Following the ‘possible deformation’ I arrive extremely quickly to … IS headquarters.This ability is reflected in the story of the 13 soldiers. The one who goes to
Sask is Maya herself. (If they have met it must have given some kind of sparks, because of the incompatibility of characters.) Maya is thinking of a romantic love affair: the possibility of hers falling on http://sonjakastentoo.wordpress.com is thus extremely high. Israeli structures of understanding do usually repress thought on these matters (12 soldiers interested in http://sonjakasten1.wordpress.com). In
Israel someone who is a ’superior’ (officer) does necessarily have knowledge of mathematics, computers and stats.
Sask is thus analyzing http://skstats.wordpress.com. The thing is that the 14 are studying three aspects of the same logic, and are moving in a general structure that is determined by what is read or seen. This same logic does offer the solution to Maya (Yes, she is very intelligent, but intuitively, Sask, no maths nor stats, but happy love stories with horrible sangers in between): she provokes the relationship of the first blog to reality by asking a question: indifferently of whether Sask is the mentioned or not, she has been put into relationship with the character of the blog through a question. “Obvious: of appearance, of empirical evidence” relative (Through the question), to an officer reality. In Maya’s mind,
Sask will never be the character in question (her rational lines do forbid the association of a ‘public’ person, in this case the officer, to a ‘private’ affair), but she has to solve the question. The fact of artificially putting someone in relationship with a created character, does solve the question for her in a definite and clear way, without though considering that the same officer will not at all have the same appreciation of her intelligent solution: the officer will think that ’she has been identified as the character Sask’ which will create greatest confusions in her general organization of reality. (Even more so as she thinks that Maya has definitely understood that she is the one, and thus probably presumes she has a strange love affair or had or may have.)This logic is the one that was used from 1994/2002 in order to transmit information. It doesn’t matter what there factually is, it is of importance what the one who receives the information may understand. In the givenm example: if Sask had that night the intention of bombing up my internet net, she gets so confused that she is hardly able of doing so. The day after she doesn’t really want it anymore.This same system may have as an effect that things be put in order through exactly the contrary path: if you don’t care about morals, you will care about noise. Consequently you will shout at your son coming late at home making horrible noise, and he will understand that to drink too much is … immoral.This somewhat schizoid and paranoic way of re establishing order has as side effect that my relationship to the other is submerged in a cloud of aleatory indetermination. As this is more or less the world a psychopath lives in, I profit of the occasion of getting famous in order to try to normalize human relationship. Why Sask becomes the target of my adoration is difficult to explain, but has certainly something to do with clouds in organization that do allow thinking that after having got quite nervous with the hypothesis she may even think it … funny. Natasha would have got less enchanted because she is really very shy.Well, if necessarily a woman it is because the reconstruction of a certain order passes through the reinforcement of notions (as said they were without concept for too many years) with separate male/female poles, that gice the backing to the possibility of forming proper concepts of man/woman. Women do represent notions in more adequate ways. Thus the interaction as conceived like that does show the lines of interaction as given in notions and to structure the concepts in a way that is adequate to reality.On the other hand, it made clear how information had been channeled for the last 10 years in a more … contemporary image. You’d never believe anything more than what is said when you are in love, or think the other in love with you. The way of bewitching someone into this mood (passive psychopathia or how to make slaves of psychopaths) is an art that may have extraordinary results if wisely delt with. You may even become a f12 function in an Excel sheet (extremely complicated mechanism of psychic association with outer reminder through symbol) in order to obtain a certain result, and that this worked for so many years becomes evident through the ‘accidental’ encounter through electronic waves as image of the psychic waves as used for all that time.Conclusion:
Sask, I admit I have had horrible fun with you, but I don’t believe in love affairs through internet.The subjective principle does determine interpretation and thus result in truth for all, except for
Sask (see, Baruwth saying, are you in love? Of course she gets furious and starts shouting around, so that Baruwth concludes to the evidence. But really Baruwth, have you ever seen anyone in love with a f12 function in an Excel sheet?). The only real eveidence for
Sask is that I’m really famous, but to say the truth, isn’t it the same seen from a different perspective.So: if you try to follow the logical mechanism inherent to my reading of stats, you will learn a lot about yourself, and little about
Sask. Well, she’s really an adorable person after all …
